Rogue Scholar Posts

language
Published in Elephant in the Lab
Author Sascha Schönig

The expectation to communicate In 2019, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research called for a cultural shift toward communicating science (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 2019). The former Federal Minister of Education and Research, Anja Karliczek, urged scientists to communicate their research continuously and classified communication as a central task for universities and research organizations (Karliczek, 2020).

Published in Elephant in the Lab
Author Antonia Lingens

In a series of short analyses we took a closer look on the practice of (co-)authorship in various disciplines, using a Scopus database (see www.elephantinthelab.org). We found significant differences among the subject areas that we analyzed. While in nearly all disciplines the mere number of authors per article increased (2010-2016), the average number of authors per paper in these disciplines varies considerably.

Published in Elephant in the Lab
Author Martin Schmidt

Scientists must compete for limited funding as well as for academic positions and recognition. Many factors contribute to success, but Hirsch’s h -index puts the emphasis squarely on citations (Hirsch, 2005). In such a system, it is perceived that more citations should lead to more funds, promotions, job security, et cetera.

Published in Elephant in the Lab
Author Martin Schmidt

Description The number of authors per article in the subject area Multidisciplinary is 3.3 on average with a maximum of 58 authors. The mean number of coauthors is decreasing by 0.1 per year in the respective time period (Figure 1). The articles in this analysis ( n = 1111) were cited 14.5 times on average with a maximum of 348 citations.

Published in Elephant in the Lab
Author Martin Schmidt

Description The number of authors per article in the subject area Mathematics is 2.9 on average with a maximum of 9 authors. The mean number of coauthors is increasing by 0.1 per year in the respective time period (Figure 1). The articles in this analysis ( n = 3657) were cited 8.2 times on average with a maximum of 357 citations.