Corin Wagen

Corin Wagen
Chemical SciencesSubstack
My personal blog, focusing on issues of chemistry and metascience, unified by trying to answer the question "how can we make science better"?
Home PageRSS FeedMastodon
language

Composite Methods in Quantum Chemistry

Published

“A cord of three strands is not easily broken.” —Ecclesiastes 4:12Abu Simbel relief of Ramesses II shooting a composite bow at the Battle of Kadesh. Computational chemistry, like all attempts to simulate reality, is defined by tradeoffs. Reality is far too complex to simulate perfectly, and so scientists have developed a plethora of approximations, each of which reduces both the cost (i.e. time) and the accuracy of the simulation.

EDA Scares Me

Published

ICYMI: Ari and I announced our new company, Rowan! We wrote an article about what we're hoping to build, which you can read here. Also, this blog is now listed on The Rogue Scholar, meaning that posts have DOIs and can be easily cited. Conventional quantum chemical computations operate on a collection of atoms and create a single wavefunction for the entire system, with an associated energy and possibly other properties.

Transition States Are Polarizable

Published

The Pauling model for enzymatic catalysis states that enzymes are “antibodies for the transition state”—in other words, they preferentially bind to the transition state of a given reaction, rather than the reactants or products. This binding interaction stabilizes the TS, thus lowering its energy and accelerating the reaction.

How Common Are Different Functional Groups?

Published

Since the ostensible purpose of organic methodology is to develop reactions that are useful in the real world, the utility of a method is in large part dictated by the accessibility of the starting materials.

The Two Cultures in Atomistic Simulation

Published

TW: stereotypes about molecular dynamics. In his fantastic essay “The Two Cultures,” C. P. Snow observed that there was (in 1950s England) a growing divide between the academic cultures of science and the humanities: Literary intellectuals at one pole—at the other scientists, and as the most representative, the physical scientists.

Machine Learning for Explicit Solvent Molecular Dynamics

Published

An important problem with simulating chemical reactions is that reactions generally take place in solvent, but most simulations are run without solvent molecules. This is a big deal, since much of the inaccuracy associated with simulation actually stems from poor treatment of solvation: when gas phase experimental data is compared to computations, the results are often quite good.

For-Profit Micro Focused Research Organizations: A Proposal

Published

TW: sarcasm. Today, most research is done by academic labs funded mainly by the government. Many articles have been written on the shortcomings with academic research: Sam Rodriques recently had a nice post about how academia is ultimately an educational institution, and how this limits the quality of academic research.

pKa and Nonpolar Media

Published

The concept of pKa is introduced so early in the organic chemistry curriculum that it’s easy to overlook what a remarkable idea it is. Briefly, for the non-chemists reading this: pKa is defined as the negative base-10 logarithm of the acidity constant of a given acid H–A: pKa := -log10([HA]/[A-][H+]) Unlike pH, which describes the acidity of a bulk solution, p

Opinionated Advice for Incoming Graduate Students

Published

You are a scientist, not a lab monkey. You ought not to view your degree as “six years of hard labor in the chemistry mines.” Always make time to go to interesting seminars, talk with other people about their research, and read the literature. Otherwise, what’s the point of being a scientist? Only one person is really looking out for your best interests: you.

Peer Review, Imperfect Feedback

Published

I’ve been pretty critical of peer review in the past, arguing that it doesn’t accomplish much, contributes to status quo bias, etc. But a few recent experiences remind me of the value that peer review provides: in today’s scientific culture, peer review is essentially the only time that scientists get honest and unbiased feedback on their work. How can this be true?

0