University of Glasgow

Roderic Page

![LgbNpkq
400x400](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqUYTcvQDUUFDlLNlNA-oRKQCMEiny6q2-dYP9g4UQUFjafugUe3e6haSUcyoEZ5HPiO3jmJD4YoDO8fAo6inCsPL5NbmvVEu5Ca0ccKBcRXrx7pR-DMZktMCRk4LUwotUfBv5/?imgmax=1600 "LgbNpkq__400x400.jpg"){border="0"
width="128" height="128" style="float:right;"}Yes, this post is indeed
an attempt to fit as many buzzwords that I don\'t really understand into
the title. I\'ve been playing around with
[Glitch](https://glitch.com/about/), which is a delightful project from
[Fog Creek](https://fogcreek.com/) (makers of Trello and co-creators of
Stack Overflow).

On first glance Glitch looks weirdly retro, and it took a little while
for me to get the hang of things. Bit it\'s fun and very powerful.
Basically it\'s a place where you can start creating web apps in your
browser, and each app is automatically hosted online. If you see an app
that you like you can see the source code (just like you can see HTML
using \"view source\" in your browser). if you want to hack on the code
you can simply create a copy and it\'s yours to play with (this is
called \"remixing\", like forking on GitHub). Your copy gets a cute name
(possibly annoyingly cute) and away you go.

If you\'re a developer, then at this point you\'re probably wondering
what is actually happening under the hood. Each Glitch app is a node.js
app, which means you\'re programming in Javascript (you can just use
HTML and client side Javascript if you want to avoid node.js). I\'m
**very** new to node.js, so Glitch has been a fun way to experiment.

There are two things which make Glitch very powerful. The first is the
\"remix\" feature. Don\'t know where to start? Find an app that looks
like it might do something you want to do, remix it, and hack away. The
code is edited online, and the editor works very well. It also checks
your code for Javascript errors as you type, which is helpful (usually).

The second great feature is that you get built in hosting for free. As
soon as you remix an app you have a functioning web site. Remixing is
very like forking in GitHub, and if you\'re running node.js on your
local machine then the benefits of Glitch might not seem obvious. But
hosting is often a pain, either you need to set up your own servers, or
use a hosting service. Glitch takes care of this for you, so your app is
instantly available for others to use.

So, what can you do with Glitch? There\'s some great examples [on the
Glitch site](https://glitch.com/community-picks), but I want to show an
almost trivial example. I\'ve created an app called \"enchanting-bongo\"
<https://enchanting-bongo.glitch.me> (yes, the name is a bit irritating)
that does one simple thing. You give it a DOI for an article and
enchanting-bongo tells you whether any of the authors of that work have
an ORCID. For example, try the DOI
[10.3897/zookeys.555.6173](https://enchanting-bongo.glitch.me/?q=10.3897/zookeys.555.6173).
Why did I write this? I\'m interested in ways to link people to the work
that they\'ve done, especially work that ends up being aggregated in
large-scale biodiversity databases like GBIF (see [Possible project:
\#itaxonomist, combining taxonomic names, DOIs, and ORCID to measure
taxonomic
impact](http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2015/08/possible-project-itaxonomist-combining.html)).

![Screenshot 2017 05 31 17 09
32](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtdaVymfBO3QIB4u4tmm1S4ZGY3r3QJmc5I6yh2HTX4JNn6ptVA0Yz8wX9sJz7IZkc9hDM-6ARFU_2Opo7ixvLt39F4hHuUX43kWp65OEgyBIxKOl25IsBdl4oMKdyeYE7hw7D/?imgmax=1600 "Screenshot 2017-05-31 17.09.32.png"){style="display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;"
border="0" width="460" height="472"}

The app does one thing. It takes the DOI and calls the
[ORCID](http://orcid.org) API to see if anyone has claimed authorship of
the paper with that DOI. You can use the app with a web browser, or you
can use an HTTP client and call the API (e.g.,
<https://enchanting-bongo.glitch.me/search?q=10.3897%2Fzookeys.555.6173>).

Glitch is an example of
[servers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serverless_computing) computing,
where you don\'t have to worry about physical servers or the software
infrastructure that runs on them (e.g., the web server itself), you just
write code. Like any buzzword, there is some pushback, see for example
[What Is "Serverless"? An Alternative
Take](https://medium.com/@hveldstra/what-is-serverless-an-alternative-take-4be773ebd1ce),
but for a fascinating essay I recommend [Why the fuss about
serverless?](https://hackernoon.com/why-the-fuss-about-serverless-4370b1596da0).
But the notion that I can simply hack away on some code and have an
instantly available web app is very attractive.

The other buzzword is
\"[microservices](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microservices)\". I\'m
forever needing to do tasks such as find a DOI for a paper, match a
\"microcitation\" to the enclosing article, locate a specimen in GBIF
based on catalogue number in a paper, parse some text into structured
data, such as a reference, geographic coordinates, etc. These are tools
that I need in lots of contexts, and I\'ve written software to do this
on my machine, often as part of larger projects. \"Microservices\" is
the idea that instead of large, monolithic apps we write a series of
minimal tools that typically do one thing, and do it well. We then chain
the together to do various tasks. Having small tools means that we can
treat each problem independently, and if the tools communicate over the
web (HTTP) then it doesn\'t matter what programming language we use.
I\'ve started thinking more and more about adopting this model and
developing a bunch of small services to perform many of the tasks I
need. Hosting these services then becomes in issue, I have web servers
in my office but they are a pain to maintain (my university is forever
insisting that I upgrade their software), so cloud-based hosting seems
the obvious way forward. Free-hosting looks ideal, so Glitch is looking
very attractive.

So, I\'m hoping to experiment more with this approach. One thing I might
do is create a series of services very like
[enchanting-bongo](https://enchanting-bongo.glitch.me/search?q=10.3897%2Fzookeys.555.6173),
have a simple web interface and an API that the web interface calls.
That way users can play with it in their web browser, then call the
service via the API if it does something useful. As a more sophisticated
example of a service, I\'m working on tools to parse Wikispecies
reference strings, and link specimen codes to records in GBIF.

One reason I\'m enthusiastic about Glitch is that it is **fun**!. Some
of the best shifts in technology that I\'ve made have been because a
tool made something easy and fun to do. For example, CouchDB made
working with structured data fun, and that was a revelation (databases,
fun, surely not). Fun is a much neglected characteristic of the tools we
use.


Yes, this post is indeed an attempt to fit as many buzzwords that I don't really understand into the title. I've been playing around with Glitch, which is a delightful project from Fog Creek (makers of Trello and co-creators of Stack Overflow).  On first glance Glitch looks weirdly retro, and it took a little while for me to get the hang of things. Bit it's fun and very powerful.

Programming with Glitch: microservices and serverless computing

![Docker](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-1XZ61dPP9RU/V7SXvuFJO5I/AAAAAAAAEP8/FDrRi3cmHDs/docker.png?imgmax=1600 "docker.png"){border="0"
width="128" height="128" style="float:right;"} Some notes on containers,
microservices, and data. The idea of packaging software into portable
containers and running them either locally or in the cloud is very
attractive (see [Docker](https://www.docker.com)). Some use cases I\'m
interested in exploring.

#### Microservices

In Towards a biodiversity knowledge graph
([doi:10.3897/rio.2.e8767](http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8767)) I
listed a number of services that are essentially self contained, such as
name parsers, reconciliation tools, resolvers, etc. Each of these could
be packaged up and made into containers.

#### Databases

We can use containers to package database servers, such as CouchDB,
ElasticSearch, and triple stores. Using containers means we don\'t need
to go through the hassle of installing the software locally. Interested
in RDF? Spin up a triple store, play with it, then switch it off if you
decide it\'s not for you. If it proves useful, you can move it to the
cloud and scale up (e.g., [sloppy.io](https://sloppy.io)).

#### Data

A final use case is to put individual datasets in a container. For
exmaple, imagine that we have a large Darwin Core Archive. We can
distribute this as a simple zip file, but you can\'t do much with this
unless you have code to parse Darwin Core. But imagine we combine that
dataset with a simpel visualisation tool, such as
[VESpeR](http://www.vesper.org.uk) (see
[doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.004](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.004)).
Users interested in the data could then play with the data without the
overhead of installing specialist software. In a sense, the data becomes
an app.


Some notes on containers, microservices, and data. The idea of packaging software into portable containers and running them either locally or in the cloud is very attractive (see Docker). Some use cases I'm interested in exploring. Microservices   In Towards a biodiversity knowledge graph (doi:10.3897/rio.2.e8767) I listed a number of services that are essentially self contained, such as name parsers, reconciliation tools, resolvers, etc.

Messaggi di Rogue Scholar

Programming with Glitch: microservices and serverless computing

Containers, microservices, and data