The question of whether sauropod cervicals got longer through ontogeny came up in the comment thread on Mike’s “How horrifying was the neck of Barosaurus?” post, and rather than bury this as a comment, I’m promoting it to a post of its own.
{.size-large .wp-image-13766 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“13766” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2016/10/27/sauropod-book-signing-at-svp-and-brontosmash-animation/mark-and-matt-with-the-sauropod-dinosaurs/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/mark-and-matt-with-the-sauropod-dinosaurs.jpg” orig-size=“2210,2210” comments-opened=“1”
Suppose that I and Matt were right in our SVPCA talk this year, and the “ Supersaurus ” cervical BYU 9024 really is the C9 of a gigantic Barosaurus . As we noted in our abstract, its total length of 1370 mm is exactly twice that of the C9 in AMNH 6341, which suggests its neck was twice as long over all — not 8.5 m but 17 m. How horrifying is that?
Long-time SV-POW! readers will remember that three years ago, full of enthusiasm after speaking about Barosaurus at the Edinburgh SVPCA, Matt and I got that talk written up in double-quick time and had it published as a PeerJ Preprint in less than three weeks. Very quickly, the preprint attracted substantive, helpful reviews: three within the first 24 hours, and several more in the next few days.
UPDATE 19 May 2016 I belatedly realized that I caused some confusion in the original version of this post.
I love Utah. I love how much of the state is given over to exposed Mesozoic rocks.
{.alignnone .wp-image-13035 .size-large loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“13035” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2016/03/14/sv-pow-on-the-road-matts-public-lecture-at-the-oklahoma-museum-of-natural-history/wedel-2016-omnh-lecture-flyer/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/wedel-2016-omnh-lecture-flyer.jpg” orig-size=“1372,1775” comments-opened=“1”
{.size-large .wp-image-12951 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“12951” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2016/02/27/giant-oklahoma-apatosaurus-mount-from-above/clash-of-the-titans-from-above/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/clash-of-the-titans-from-above.jpg” orig-size=“1704,2272” comments-opened=“1”
Ten years ago today — on 15 September 2005 — my first palaeo paper was published: Taylor and Naish (2005) on the phylogenetic nomenclature of diplodocoids. It’s strange to think how fast the time has gone, but I hope you’ll forgive me if I get a bit self-indulgent and nostalgic.
