Cameron Neylon

I just wanted to point to [a post that Tim O'Reilly
wrote](http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/11/political-endorsement-appropriate-tech-sites.html)
just before the US election a few weeks back. There was an interesting
discussion about the rights and wrongs of him posting on his political
views and the rights and wrongs of that being linked to from the
O'Reilly Media front page. In amongst the abuse that you have come to
expect in public political discussions there is some thought provoking
stuff. But what I wanted to point out and hopefully revive a discussion
of is a point he makes right near the bottom.

\[I have conflated two levels of comments here (Tim is quoting his own
comment) -- see the original post for the context\]

> > "Thanks to everyone for wading in, especially those of you who are
> > marshalling reasoned arguments and sharing actual sources and
> > references, showing you've done your homework, and helping other
> > people to see the data that helped to shape your point of view. We
> > need a LOT more of that in this discussion, rather than slinging
> > unsupported allegations back and forth.
> >
> > Bringing this back to tech -- showing the data behind your argument
> > is a lot like open source. It's a way of verifying the "code" that's
> > inside your head. If you can't show us your code, it's a lot harder
> > to trust your results!"
>
> Links as source code for your thinking: that's a meme that should
> survive the particulars of this particular debate!

In a sense Tim is advocating the wholesale adoption of the very strong
attribution culture we (like to think we) have in academic research. The
importance of acknowedging your sources is clear but it also has much
more value than that. By tracing back the influences that have brought
someone to a specific conclusion or belief it is possible for other
people to gain a much deeper insight into how those ideas evolved. Being
able to parse the dependencies between ideas, data, samples, papers, and
knowledge in an automatic, machine readable, way is the promise of the
semantic web, but in the meantime just helping the poor old humans to
trace back and understand where someone is coming from is very helpful.


I just wanted to point to a post that Tim O’Reilly wrote just before the US election a few weeks back. There was an interesting discussion about the rights and wrongs of him posting on his political views and the rights and wrongs of that being linked to from the O’Reilly Media front page. In amongst the abuse that you have come to expect in public political discussions there is some thought provoking stuff.

Postagens de Rogue Scholar

Links as the source code of our thinking – Tim O’Reilly