Published May 2, 2014 | https://doi.org/10.59350/ppcbc-yt542

Trigonal bipyramidal or square pyramidal: Another ten minute exploration.

  • 1. ROR icon Imperial College London
Feature image

This is rather cranking the handle, but taking my previous post and altering the search definition of the crystal structure database from 4- to 5-coordinate metals, one gets the following.

Fe ...

Fe …

Co ...

Co …

Ni ...

Ni …

Cu ...

Cu …

Trigonal bipyramidal coordination has angles of 90, 120 and 180°. Square pyramidal has no 120° angles, and the 180° angles might be somewhat reduced. Thus the Fe and Co series have plenty of 120, whereas the Ni and Cu series hardly any. The Ni series has many 160° values. It is clearly a serious issue that attempting any correlation with the spin states is going to be a lot of really hard work (I might next do another simple search where bond lengths can be shown to very closely correlate with low/medium/high spin states). I will not be trying a more finely grained analysis of the above plots; I just wanted to point out how very simple and quick they are to generate.


Acknowledgments

This post has been cross-posted in PDF format at Authorea.

Additional details

Description

This is rather cranking the handle, but taking my previous post and altering the search definition of the crystal structure database from 4- to 5-coordinate metals, one gets the following. Fe … Co … Ni … Cu … Trigonal bipyramidal coordination has angles of 90, 120 and 180°. Square pyramidal has no 120° angles, and the 180° angles might be somewhat reduced.

Identifiers

UUID
f76ec3ac-41c8-4332-8481-8c77b5c0b80a
GUID
http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=12500
URL
https://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=12500

Dates

Issued
2014-05-02T10:05:22
Updated
2023-09-16T20:49:15