Published May 8, 2007 | https://doi.org/10.59350/t04vc-kbd73

Duplicate DOIs

  • 1. ROR icon University of Glasgow
Feature image

I think this isn't supposed to happen, but here's a paper with two DOIs.

The first DOI is doi:10.1651/0278-0372(1997)17[253:MPAOTC]2.0.CO;2, which links to a record served by BIOONE. The second is doi:10.2307/1549275, which links to a JSTOR record (sici:0278-0372(199705)17:2<253:MPAOTC>2.0.CO;2-O).

The paper is:

Morphology-Based Phylogenetic Analysis of the Clawed Lobsters (Family Nephropidae and the New Family Chilenophoberidae)
Dale Tshudy, Loren E. Babcock
Journal of Crustacean Biology, Vol. 17, No. 2 (May, 1997), pp. 253-263


Now, the digital versions served by BIOONE and JSTOR is different, in that BIOONE serves full text HTML and a PDF, whereas JSTOR serves scanned images, but this is the same article.

As an added "feature", the BIOONE DOI doesn't work, which in my experience is often the case with BIOONE DOIs.

Additional details

Description

I think this isn't supposed to happen, but here's a paper with two DOIs. The first DOI is doi:10.1651/0278-0372(1997)17[253:MPAOTC]2.0.CO;2, which links to a record served by BIOONE.

Identifiers

UUID
80157ce2-b5f2-462f-86ff-83ea433d2154
GUID
tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16081779.post-1597102984643985566
URL
https://iphylo.blogspot.com/2007/05/duplicate-dois.html

Dates

Issued
2007-05-08T13:33:00
Updated
2007-05-08T13:37:31

Citations

  1. Ellmann, M. (2019). Same-Same But Different: On Understanding Duplicates in Stack Overflow. Informatik Spektrum, 42(4), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-019-01185-y