How did the horrible Yale "Brontosaurus" skull come to be?

Taylor, Mike

doi:10.59350/bk2bm-8wa19

Published November 14, 2014 | https://doi.org/10.59350/bk2bm-8wa19

How did the horrible Yale "Brontosaurus" skull come to be?

Taylor, Mike¹

1. University of Bristol

A while back, Ben Miller reminded me that when I posted about the old Yale "Brontosaurus" skull, I promised:

So how did the YPM come to make such a monstrosity? What was it based on? Tune in next time for the surprising details!

I told him at the time that I'd soon get around to writing a post. But before I did, he wrote a post on this himself: Bully for Camarasaurus. And it's excellent. Go and read it!

I don't have a lot to add to what Ben has written, except regarding this:

What Marsh had instead [when restoring the skull for his 1891 "Brontosaurus" reconstruction] were a few fragmentary bits of Camarasaurus cranial material, plus a snout and jaw (USNM 5730) now considered to be Brachiosaurus.

Here's what Marsh came up with:

But what of the supposed Brachiosaurus skull that he used as a reference? It was finally described 107 years later by Carpenter and Tidwell (1998), in a paper that helpfully also lays out the history behind it. Here's how it looks:

The skull was found by a crew under the supervision of M. P. Felch in the western part of his Quarry 1, Garden Park, Colorado. Felch reported it to O. C. Marsh in a letter of 8 September 1883. It was found by a meter-long cervical vertebra that probably belonged to Brachiosaurus "which was destroyed during attempts to collect it" (McIntosh and Berman 1975:196). [Of course, Felch and Marsh could hardly have been expected to identify this vertebra correctly, as Brachiosaurus would not be discovered and named for another twenty years (Riggs 1903), and the nature of its neck would not become apparent until Janensch (1914) described the related brachiosaurid Giraffatitan (= "Brachiosaurus") brancai.]

The Felch skull, along with other material from the quarry, was shipped to Marsh at Yale in October of that year, and was initially assigned the specimen number YPM 1986. At that time it was only partially prepared, hence the rather poor resemblance between the restored version above and Marsh's hypothetical "Brontosaurus" [= Apatosaurus] skull that was based on it.

It's notable that Holland (1915) was quite certain that this was not a skull of Brontosaurus, and that a Diplodocus-like skull found with the A. louisae holotype belonged to it. It's worth reading the skull section of his paper to see just how solid his reasoning was. And it's extraordinary to think that Osborn's power, all the way over in New York, was so great that he was able to successfully bully Holland, 370 miles away in Pittsburgh, into not putting the evidently correct skull on the Carnegie Museum's Apatosaurus mount. That mount remained sadly headless until after Holland's death.

Aaanyway, YPM 1986 was pretty much ignored after Marsh's abuse of it as a reference for the Brontosaurus reconstruction's skull. After Marsh's death in 1899, much of the material collected by Felch was transferred to the Smithsonian (US National Museum of Natural History). The skull was among these specimens, and so was re-catalogued as USNM 5730.

As so often, it was Jack McIntosh who rediscovered this skull and recognised its true affinities. Some time after his tentative identification of the skull as pertaining to Brachiosaurus (presumably on the basis of its resemblance to that of Giraffatitan), Carpenter borrowed the skull, had it more fully prepared, wrote the description, and had a restored model constructed from casts of the preserved elements and models of the missing ones.

Carpenter and Tidwell (1998:fig. 2) also handily showed the restored Felch quarry skull alongside those of other sauropods:

By re-ordering the top row, we can see what a neat intermediate it is between the skulls of Camarasaurus (left) and Giraffatitan (= "Brachiosaurus" of their usage):

I provisionally accepted USNM 5730 as belonging to Brachiosaurus in my re-evaluation of 2009, and included it in my reconstruction (Taylor 2009:fig. 7):

{.size-full .wp-image-11039 aria-describedby="caption-attachment-11039" loading="lazy" attachment-id="11039" permalink="http://svpow.com/2014/11/14/how-did-the-horrible-yale-brontosaurus-skull-come-to-be/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r3/" orig-file="https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg" orig-size="4320,2937" comments-opened="1" image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" image-title="Taylor-SVP-Brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-R3" image-description="" image-caption="

Taylor (2007: figure 7). Skeletal reconstruction of Brachiosaurus altithorax. White bones represent the elements of the holotype FMNH P 25107. Light grey bones represent material referred to B. altithorax: the Felch Quarry skull USNM 5730, the cervical vertebrae BYU 12866 (C?5) and BYU 12867 (C?10), the "Ultrasauros" scapulocoracoid BYU 9462, the Potter Creek left humerus USNM 21903, left radius and right metacarpal III BYU 4744, and the left metacarpal II OMNH 01138. Dark grey bones modified from Paul's (1988) reconstruction of Giraffatitan brancai. Scale bar equals 2 m.

" medium-file="https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=300" large-file="https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=1024" width="480" height="326" srcset="https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=480&h=326 480w, https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=960&h=652 960w, https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=150&h=102 150w, https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=300&h=204 300w, https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/taylor-svp-brachiosaurus-fig7-reconstruction-r31.jpeg?w=768&h=522 768w" sizes="(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px"}

Taylor (2007: figure 7). Skeletal reconstruction of Brachiosaurus altithorax. White bones represent the elements of the holotype FMNH P 25107. Light grey bones represent material referred to B. altithorax: the Felch Quarry skull USNM 5730, the cervical vertebrae BYU 12866 (C?5) and BYU 12867 (C?10), the "Ultrasauros" scapulocoracoid BYU 9462, the Potter Creek left humerus USNM 21903, left radius and right metacarpal III BYU 4744, and the left metacarpal II OMNH 01138. Dark grey bones modified from Paul's (1988) reconstruction of Giraffatitan brancai. Scale bar equals 2 m.

But as noted by Carpenter and Tidwell (1998:82), the lack of comparable parts between the Felch skull and the Brachiosaurus holotype (which remains the only definitive Brachiosaurus material) means that the assignment has to remain tentative.

What we really need is a more complete Brachiosaurus specimen: one with both a skull and good postcervical elements that let us refer it definitively to Brachiosaurus altithorax by comparison with the holotype. And heck, while we're at it, let's have a specimen with a good neck, too!

The real question remains: how did Marsh, using a brachiosaur skull as his basis, come up with this?

And stranger still, how someone at the Yale Peabody Museum — we don't know who — used it, or more likely Marsh's reconstruction, as a basis for this sculpture:

The Yale mount didn't go up until 1931 — the last of the Big Four Apatosaurus mounts after the AMNH, Carnegie and Field Museum, which is surprising as it was the first of those specimens to be found. So by the time the skull was sculpted, sauropod skulls were actually reasonably well known. It's not clear quite how anyone working from a decent reconstruction of, say, a Camarasaurus skull — the one in Osborn and Mook (1921:figure 30), say — could come up with this monster.

The last thing to say is this: it does credit to the YPM that they display this historically important sculpture rather than hiding it away and pretending it never happened. For me, part of the fascination of palaeontology is seeing not just how organisms evolved through prehistory but how ideas evolved through history. It's great that we can still see important mistakes, alongside their corrections (i.e. the new and lovely skull on the YPM Apatosaurus mount.)

References

Carpenter, Kenneth, and Virginia Tidwell. 1998. Preliminary description of a Brachiosaurus skull from Felch Quarry 1, Garden Park, Colorado. Modern Geology 23:69-84.
Holland, William J. 1915. Heads and tails: a few notes relating to the structure of the sauropod dinosaurs. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 9:273-278.
Janensch, Werner. 1914. Ubersicht uber der Wirbeltierfauna der Tendaguru-Schichten nebst einer kurzen Charakterisierung der neu aufgefuhrten Arten von Sauropoden. Archiv fur Biontologie, Berlin III, 1(1):81-110.
Marsh, O. C. 1891. Restoration of Triceratops (with plates XV and XVI). American Journal of Science, 3rd series 41(244):339-342.
McIntosh, John S., and David, S. Berman. 1975. Description of the palate and lower jaw of the sauropod dinosaur Diplodocus (Reptilia: Saurischia) with remarks on the nature of the skull of Apatosaurus. Journal of Paleontology 49(1):187-199.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield, and Charles C. Mook. 1921. Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias and other sauropods of Cope. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, n.s. 3:247-387, and plates LX-LXXXV.
Riggs, Elmer S. 1903. Brachiosaurus altithorax, the largest known dinosaur. American Journal of Science 15(4):299-306.
Taylor, Michael P. 2009. A re-evaluation of Brachiosaurus altithorax Riggs 1903 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) and its generic separation from Giraffatitan brancai (Janensch 1914). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29(3):787-806.

Additional details

A while back, Ben Miller reminded me that when I posted about the old Yale " Brontosaurus " skull, I promised: So how did the YPM come to make such a monstrosity? What was it based on? Tune in next time for the surprising details! I told him at the time that I'd soon get around to writing a post. But before I did, he wrote a post on this himself: Bully for Camarasaurus . And it's excellent.

UUID: 4b9072e0-af04-4877-a2fe-52587659f87e
GUID: http://svpow.com/?p=10949
URL: https://svpow.com/2014/11/14/how-did-the-horrible-yale-brontosaurus-skull-come-to-be

Issued: 2014-11-14T09:07:17
Updated: 2014-11-14T09:07:17

Carpenter, Kenneth, and Virginia Tidwell. 1998. Preliminary description of a Brachiosaurus skull from Felch Quarry 1, Garden Park, Colorado. Modern Geology 23:69-84.
Holland, William J. 1915. Heads and tails: a few notes relating to the structure of the sauropod dinosaurs. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 9:273-278.
Janensch, Werner. 1914. Ubersicht uber der Wirbeltierfauna der Tendaguru-Schichten nebst einer kurzen Charakterisierung der neu aufgefuhrten Arten von Sauropoden. Archiv fur Biontologie, Berlin III, 1(1):81-110.
Marsh, O. C. 1891. Restoration of Triceratops (with plates XV and XVI). American Journal of Science, 3rd series 41(244):339-342.
McIntosh, John S., and David, S. Berman. 1975. Description of the palate and lower jaw of the sauropod dinosaur Diplodocus (Reptilia: Saurischia) with remarks on the nature of the skull of Apatosaurus. Journal of Paleontology 49(1):187-199.
Osborn, Henry Fairfield, and Charles C. Mook. 1921. Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias and other sauropods of Cope. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, n.s. 3:247-387, and plates LX-LXXXV.
Riggs, Elmer S. 1903. Brachiosaurus altithorax, the largest known dinosaur. American Journal of Science 15(4):299-306.
Taylor, Michael P. 2009. A re-evaluation of Brachiosaurus altithorax Riggs 1903 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) and its generic separation from Giraffatitan brancai (Janensch 1914). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29(3):787-806.

	All versions	This version
Views	0	0
Downloads	0	0
Data volume	0 Bytes	0 Bytes

How did the horrible Yale "Brontosaurus" skull come to be?

References

Additional details

Description

Identifiers

Dates

References

How did the horrible Yale "Brontosaurus" skull come to be?

Creators

References

Additional details

Description

Identifiers

Dates

References