Published
Author Ingo Rohlfing
Some ideas about how the peer review process in academic publishing can be used as a device for preregistering parts of an empirical analysis.
Some ideas about how the peer review process in academic publishing can be used as a device for preregistering parts of an empirical analysis.
Why the filling of gaps in the research literature is similar to replication and probably better than its reputation.
How to enhance reproducibility when using fs/QCA software
Recently, I came across an interesting study from 2009, the content of which is not relevant here.