Social SciencesSubstack

Critical Metascience

Critical Metascience
Critical perspectives in metascience and the philosophy of science relating to open science, science reform, and the replication crisis.
Home PageRSS Feed
language
Published
Author Mark Rubin

The inflation of Type I error rates is thought to be one of the causes of the replication crisis. Questionable research practices such as p-hacking are thought to inflate Type I error rates above their nominal level, leading to unexpectedly high levels of false positives in the literature and, consequently, unexpectedly low replication rates. In this article, I offer an alternative view.

Published
Author Mark Rubin

I contrast Popper's (1983, 2002) theory testing approach with that of Lakatos (1978) and a related approach called naïve methodological falsificationism. I conclude that the replication crisis is least problematic in the Lakatosian approach.

Published
Author Mark Rubin

In this new article, I consider questionable research practices in the field of metascience. A questionable metascience practice (QMP) is a research practice, assumption, or perspective that’s been questioned by several commentators as being potentially problematic for metascience and/or the science reform movement. I discuss 10 QMPs that relate to criticism, replication, bias, generalization, and the characterization of science.