Published December 27, 2006 | https://doi.org/10.63485/yt3b3-rzr96

More on SPARC's comment to the ARC draft OA policy

Creators & Contributors

Stevan Harnad, On SPARC's Advice to the Australian Research Council, Open Access Archivangelism, December 25, 2006.

Summary: The Australian Research Council (ARC) has proposed to mandate OA self-archiving by its fundees. SPARC has advised ARC (1) to require retaining non-exclusive rights as well, (2) to require OA self-archiving within 6 months of publication, and (3) to earmark ARC funds for OA journal publication costs, so OA can be immediate. I suggest instead (1) that to mandate self-archiving it is neither necessary nor desirable to mandate retaining non-exclusive rights at this time, (2) that deposit should be mandated immediately upon publication, with any allowable 6-month delay applying not to the timing of the deposit itself but only to the timing of the setting of access to the deposit (as Open Access rather than Closed Access), and (3) that it is neither desirable nor necessary at this time to earmark ARC funds to pay to publish in OA journals for immediate OA: Institutional Repositories' EMAIL EPRINT REQUEST button will be sufficient to tide over user needs during any 6-month embargo interval between deposit and OA. (Australia's OA specialist Arthur Sale concurs.)

Files

10.63485_yt3b3-rzr96.pdf

Files (99.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9c6f996f752cf50293c6a3f64eae9ba2
99.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Description

Stevan Harnad, On SPARC's Advice to the Australian Research Council, Open Access Archivangelism , December 25, 2006.

Identifiers

GUID
tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3536726.post-116723170205328608
URL
https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/12/more-on-sparcs-comment-to-arc-draft-oa.html

Dates

Issued
2006-12-27T00:00:00Z
Updated
2006-12-27T19:30:27Z