Published December 20, 2013 | https://doi.org/10.59348/n5n85-1gq42

Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long

Creators & Contributors

Dear X and Y,

I'm writing in a state of some frustration and disappointment to withdraw my essay from Top Journal in My Field of American Literature. I submitted the piece on the 2nd of August, 2012, now 1 year and 4 months ago. I have not received any reader reports on the article.

I appreciate that you are reliant on academics to review for you and that delays occur in the process. However, I have waited through multiple assurances, especially as you noted that you were "very excited" about having the piece reviewed in September 2012 [after a consultation with the editorial board as to whether the scope could be expanded to accommodate the piece], to no avail.

After this delay, even if you were to have the piece reviewed now, it will receive reports indicating that substantial portions of the literature are not cited; this is because they have been published in the substantial interim between submission and review.

I'm very sorry to do this; it is not what I wanted by any means, but I don't feel happy to wait any longer.

Best wishes,

Martin

Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long was originally published by Martin Paul Eve at eve.gd: Martin Paul Eve on December 20, 2013.

Files

10.59348_n5n85-1gq42.pdf

Files (98.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f8c0e3c1912f43c1216479937e692a17
98.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Description

Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long was originally published by Martin Paul Eve at eve.gd: Martin Paul Eve on December 20, 2013.

Identifiers

Dates

Issued
2013-12-20T00:00:00Z
Updated
2013-12-20T14:54:56Z