OA keeps authors honest
Creators & Contributors
I've seen several arguments over the years that citing OA articles makes it easy for readers to verify that authors are accurately representing their sources, while citing TA articles makes this difficult and protects authors who want to blow smoke. The most detailed case I've seen for this conclusion is also the most recent: Mark Liberman, Open-access sex stereotypes, Language Log, September 10, 2006.
Files
10.63485_63aa9-9m285.pdf
Files
(93.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a97288f0d63f237b91e24396450d2c71
|
93.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Description
I've seen several arguments over the years that citing OA articles makes it easy for readers to verify that authors are accurately representing their sources, while citing TA articles makes this difficult and protects authors who want to blow smoke. The most detailed case I've seen for this conclusion is also the most recent: Mark Liberman, Open-access sex stereotypes, Language Log , September 10, 2006.
Identifiers
- GUID
- tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3536726.post-115799535190633252
- URL
- https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/09/oa-keeps-authors-honest.html
Dates
- Issued
-
2006-09-11T00:00:00Z
- Updated
-
2006-09-11T17:24:08Z