Published September 15, 2006 | https://doi.org/10.63485/k2jv7-w2k10

First results of the MIRACLE survey

Creators & Contributors

Karen Markey and five co-authors, Nationwide Census of Institutional Repositories: Preliminary Findings, a presentation at JCDL 2006 (Chapel Hill, June 11-15, 2006).   (Thanks to DigitalKoans.) 

Abstract:   The MIRACLE (Making Institutional Repositories A Collaborative Learning Environment) Project is a multi-phased research project that is investigating the development of institutional repositories (IRs) in American colleges and universities to identify models and best practices in the administration, technical infrastructure, and access to repository collections. This paper features preliminary findings from the project's first phase, a nationwide census that will reveal the extent of college and university involvement with IRs in the United States. Preliminary findings address the types of investigative activities that institutions are conducting prior to making the decision to implement an IR, perceived benefits of IRs, staffing for IRs, methods of recruiting digital content, characteristics of operational IRs including their costs, and respondents' next steps on the road to implementing an IR.

One table in the paper ranks the top and bottom three benefits of IRs.  The top three were "Capturing the intellectual capital
of your institution", "Better service to contributors", and "Longtime preservation of your institution's digital output".  The bottom three were "Reducing user dependence on your library's print collection", "Providing maximal access to the results of publicly funded research", and "An increase in citation counts to your institution's intellectual
output".

When institutions without IRs were asked why they didn't have one yet, the top two reasons given were "Other priorities, issues, activities, etc., are more pressing than an IR" and "We have no available resources to support planning".  The bottom three reasons were "We do not understand or believe in the value or effectiveness of an IR", "We have no support from our library's administration", and "We do not need an IR
These top and bottom reasons indicate".

Files

10.63485_k2jv7-w2k10.pdf

Files (100.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:db5680a2ca8cd815f38f63981001dd20
100.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Description

Karen Markey and five co-authors, Nationwide Census of Institutional Repositories: Preliminary Findings, a presentation at JCDL 2006 (Chapel Hill, June 11-15, 2006). (Thanks to DigitalKoans.) One table in the paper ranks the top and bottom three benefits of IRs.

Identifiers

GUID
tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3536726.post-115833655381063713
URL
https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/09/first-results-of-miracle-survey.html

Dates

Issued
2006-09-15T00:00:00Z
Updated
2006-09-15T16:09:14Z