Published November 3, 2006 | https://doi.org/10.63485/w62r9-9rs52

Publication metrics, including the OA impact advantage

Creators & Contributors

Colin Steele, Linda Butler, and Danny Kingsley, The publishing imperative: the pervasive influence of publication metrics, Learned Publishing, October 2006 (accessible only to subscribers).  See the self-archived, OA copy.

Abstract:   This article summarises the effects of the increasing global trend towards measuring research quality and effectiveness through, in particular, publication-based metrics, and its effects on scholarly communication. Such metrics are increasingly influencing the behaviour patterns of administrators, publishers, librarians and researchers. Impact and citation measures, which often rely solely on Thomson Scientific data, are examined in the context of university league tables and research assessment exercises. The need to establish alternate metrics, particularly for the social sciences and humanities, is emphasised, as is an holistic approach to scholarly communication agendas.

Files

10.63485_w62r9-9rs52.pdf

Files (97.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:774147293a8138f61c38f720e7ada2ca
97.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Description

Colin Steele, Linda Butler, and Danny Kingsley, The publishing imperative: the pervasive influence of publication metrics, Learned Publishing , October 2006 (accessible only to subscribers). See the self-archived, OA copy.

Identifiers

GUID
tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3536726.post-116252848123170668
URL
https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/11/publication-metrics-including-oa-impact.html

Dates

Issued
2006-11-03T00:00:00Z
Updated
2006-11-03T04:34:41Z