Correction: Nature hasn't made up its mind about open review

Timo Hannay set the record straight at Nature's Nascent blog this morning:

[A]nyone who read this or this about Nature's open peer review trial can rest assured that it's NOT true. We haven't made a decision about this yet. There's been a recent uptick in coverage of our trial following an article (subscribers only) in the 14 September issue of the Wall Street Journal. Some others then reported this as a new initiative even though it's now been going for almost four months. Matt Whipp went further and put it in the future tense, which Peter Suber seems to [have] interpreted as a scoop rather than a mistake.

PS:  Thanks, Timo.  I stand corrected.