Published August 12, 2025 | https://doi.org/10.59350/h16nz-g0c40

Making bibliometric reporting more transparent and consistent: Participants needed for pilot testing of GLOBAL

Leiden Madtrics readers might already be familiar with what some have called a "great project" but a "terrible acronym": GLOBAL, the Guidance List for the repOrting of Bibliometric AnaLyses.

Last summer, we invited bibliometricians to join the GLOBAL Delphi study to co-develop a reporting guideline for bibliometric analyses. Since then, our international team has completed a scoping review, and conducted two Delphi rounds, including an in-person consensus meeting in Berlin following the 2024 Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI) conference.

We're in the final stretch of developing the GLOBAL reporting guideline and are seeking your input to help improve it! We are currently recruiting pilot testers to evaluate the usability and clarity of the draft GLOBAL checklist in real-world settings.

You are eligible to participate in the pilot testing if before the end of September 2025 you are:

  • Preparing a research article that reports a bibliometric analysis, or
  • Acting as a peer reviewer for such an article.

We welcome participants from all disciplines and career stages, as long as they have experience with bibliometric studies.

If you are interested in taking part in the pilot, you can get started right away. We've already prepared everything you'll need. Please download the following documents:

For the pilot testing, please consider whether the manuscript which you are assessing clearly reports on each item in the GLOBAL checklist as outlined in the documents above. Once you have completed your assessment, please share your feedback via the pilot-test survey form.

Your input will directly inform the final version of the guideline, and contributors will be acknowledged in the final publication.

For more information on GLOBAL, please see the Scholcommlab website. If you have any questions regarding the pilot study, please email Jeremy Y. Ng. Thank you for helping shape the future of bibliometric reporting!

DOI: 10.59350/h16nz-g0c40 (export/download/cite this blog post)

Files

h16nz-g0c40.pdf

Files (205.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bcf3cd43affcadcd847f492341ead2c3
102.5 kB Preview Download
md5:07526ca89cf6f10ba903923931f6e4a4
102.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Description

Leiden Madtrics readers might already be familiar with what some have called a "great project" but a "terrible acronym": GLOBAL, the Guidance List for the repOrting of Bibliometric AnaLyses. Last summer, we invited bibliometricians to join the GLOBAL Delphi study to co-develop a reporting guideline for bibliometric analyses.

Identifiers

GUID
https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/making-bibliometric-reporting-more-transparent-and-consistent-participants-needed-for-pilot-testing-of-global
URL
https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/making-bibliometric-reporting-more-transparent-and-consistent-participants-needed-for-pilot-testing-of-global

Dates

Issued
2025-08-12T08:30:00Z
Updated
2026-08-24T23:17:56Z